I did a lot of reading this evening about pinterest and copyright.
There’s a lot of information out there about how it’s violating copyright law. Which it is. But that’s not the point that kills it for me.
My main objection is that the file info, which has embedded ownership info is stripped from the photo file and then uploaded onto their servers. (hosted on amazon servers incidentally, and we all know amazon can’t even be bothered to pay sales tax..)
Meaning, the only way that image is now linked to you is by a database linking the info with the image. So when the database gets corrupted, or the server dies, or they accidentally overwrite their live database instead of the backup, then that link between you and your image is gone. I mention these specific problems because as software QA I’ve seen them all happen. Sometimes the information can be recovered, sometimes not.
So while in it’s current form where images are linked to original sources through their UI, so you can click through. I really like it. It makes it easy to find new interesting things, and at least for right now, people are posting interesting things.
But… The problem is they aren’t taking good care of other people’s work.
Is it ignorance, a bug they need to fix, or by design?? I’m thinking the first two. But I guess we’ll see how it goes. I’m pretty sure they don’t have much or any quality assurance, given the number of bugs on the site. I mean seriously, did no one test that apostrophes work? That’s just weird.
If you have images on the web. To prevent them from being sucked up onto their servers without your embeded file info you have to put this line somewhere in a page header:
<meta name=”pinterest” content=”nopin” />
Flickr has a setting in the privacy tab to turn off sharing. Which will prevent this from happening as well. (which also means facebook, tumblr, etc)
I had a few pins up of books and artwork and I’ve removed them all. I don’t feel right about it.
I may end up deleting my account too. I’m still waiting to see how this plays out.
I think that they have been careless about promoting violation of copyright. They expressly discourage self-promotion. Which means the only stuff you have copyright for, they don’t want you to post.
And they are careless about retaining the original image information.
——
I can’t figure out how to reply to comments in tumblr… which sucks!
But in response to how is pinterest different than tumblr. My whole point is that pinterest is taking the image and stripping out your embedded information, such as your name, the title of your work, and your copyright information. Tumblr does NOT do that. They do take the image and host it but it’s intact with it’s original embedded file info.
One other difference is that I don’t have button on my bookmark bar that is specifically there to snag someone ELSE’S work. Pinterest doesn’t encourage to post your own stuff. That’s mostly what I post here in tumblr.